Capital Models

PSC vs
Traditional Grants

Traditional grants are one-and-done: capital is spent and gone. PSC recycles that same capital through beneficiary pay-forward, generating 33× more system value over 30 years.

What Grants Got Right

Grants embody something beautiful: pure gift. No strings attached, no returns expected, no intermediaries extracting value. When a foundation gives a grant, 100% of that capital goes directly to the mission—immediately.

This directness matters. Unlike investments that require commercial returns, or endowments that lock up 95% of capital, grants put every dollar to work on day one. For emergency relief, capacity building, and catalytic interventions, this immediacy is exactly right.

100%
Goes to mission immediately
$800B+
Global annual philanthropy
0%
Value extracted

The Structural Gap: Terminal Capital

Grants solve immediate problems but create fragmented, unsustainable systems.

The Fragmentation Problem

When grants end, organizations scramble for the next one. This creates a nonprofit sector perpetually running on fumes—chasing funding cycles instead of building sustainable programs.

For Organizations

  • • 40% of staff time on fundraising
  • • Programs pivot to match funder priorities
  • • Institutional knowledge lost between grants
  • • Mission drift to "what's fundable"

For Beneficiaries

  • • Programs end mid-impact
  • • Relationships severed at funding end
  • • Progress lost when staff turn over
  • • No continuity of support

Why This Matters

The grant model treats capital as consumable fuel: burn it, seek more, repeat. This works for one-time interventions but creates structural fragility for ongoing missions. Organizations become dependent on the fundraising cycle rather than the communities they serve.

PSC transforms capital from fuel to flywheel. Instead of being consumed, capital cycles through beneficiaries who contribute when they succeed. The grant becomes self-renewing— still 100% deployed immediately, but now regenerating for the next cohort.

The Fundamental Difference

Both deploy 100% immediately. But what happens next is completely different.

Traditional Grant

Capital is deployed once and consumed. The grant ends when the money is spent. New impact requires new fundraising.

Simple to administer
Immediate full deployment
No beneficiary obligations
Capital gone after one use
Requires constant fundraising
30-Year System Value
$100,000
(1× multiplier)

Perpetual Social Capital

Capital is deployed immediately, but it recycles. Beneficiaries pay forward when they succeed, regenerating the pool for future impact.

100% deployed immediately
Capital regenerates each cycle
Self-sustaining over time
Impact compounds each cycle
Builds beneficiary community
30-Year System Value (R=0.95)
$2,670,000
(26.7× multiplier)

Cumulative System Value Over 30 Years

Starting with $100,000, see how PSC's recycling mechanism creates exponentially more value.

Grant: One-time deployment | PSC: R=0.9, 3-year cycles

Feature Comparison

FeatureGrantPSC
Initial Capital$100,000$100,000
Immediate Impact100% deployed100% deployed
Capital After UseGone foreverRecycled at R factor
30-Year System Value$100K (1×)$2.67M (26.7×)
Beneficiary ConnectionEnds at grantOngoing relationship
SustainabilityRequires new fundingSelf-sustaining
Administrative SimplicityVery simpleModerate complexity
Impact MeasurementOften unclearBuilt into R factor

The Math Behind the Difference

Understanding how recycling creates compound value.

Traditional Grant

Year 0: Deploy $100K

Year 1+: Capital consumed

Total value: $100K

SVM = 1×

PSC (R=0.9, 3yr cycles)

Cycle 1: $100K → 90K returns

Cycle 2: $90K → 81K returns

Cycle 3: $81K → 73K returns

... continues for 10 cycles ...

SVM = 26.7×

Formula: SVM = 1 / (1 - R)

Where R is the recycling rate (0.9 = 90% of capital returns each cycle)

When Each Model Makes Sense

Choose Grants When:

  • Emergency relief with no pay-forward possibility
  • One-time equipment or infrastructure purchases
  • Beneficiaries have no future income potential
  • Administrative capacity is very limited

Choose PSC When:

  • Beneficiaries can pay forward when successful
  • Long-term, sustainable impact is the goal
  • You want to build community among beneficiaries
  • Education, healthcare, small business contexts

Grants Are Terminal. PSC Is Regenerative.

The Regenerative Capital Theory paper formalizes this distinction: grants follow terminal logic—capital flows to beneficiaries and stops. PSC follows regenerativelogic—capital flows through beneficiaries and continues. This isn't about requiring repayment; it's about designing systems where success naturally cycles back.

Read the RCT Paper (Theory)

Transform Your Grant Into Perpetual Impact

See how your next grant could generate 30× more value through PSC's recycling mechanism.