Regenerative Equilibrium Analyzer

Model macroeconomic equilibrium conditions for regenerative capital

GERC Explainer View Paper

System Status: Unstable

Aggregate R*: 41% | Equilibrium Score: 57%

57%

Overall Score

Sector Regeneration Rates

Financial Services

30%

Manufacturing

40%

Agriculture

60%

Services

35%

System Parameters

Extractive Capital Share60%

Lower is better for regenerative equilibrium

Investment Horizon5 years

Natural Regeneration Cycle10 years

Equilibrium Conditions

Cross-Sector Capital Flow Balance

∑ᵢ Fᵢⱼ = ∑ⱼ Fⱼᵢ for all sectors

Net capital flows between regenerative and extractive activities must balance at equilibrium.

80%

Regenerative Threshold Condition

R* > R_critical for stability

The aggregate regeneration index must exceed the critical threshold for self-sustaining growth.

83%

Temporal Coherence Constraint

τ_investment ≈ τ_regeneration

Investment time horizons must align with natural regeneration cycles.

50%

Feedback Loop Stability

λ_max(J) < 0

Maximum eigenvalue of the Jacobian must be negative for stable equilibrium.

17%

Transition Pathway to Regenerative Equilibrium

Extraction Dominant

Current extractive systems dominate

Early Transition

Regenerative pilots emerge

Tipping Point

Regenerative becomes competitive

Stable Regenerative

Self-sustaining equilibrium

Key Insight from GERC Theory

General equilibrium for regenerative capital is achieved when all sectors' time horizons align with natural regeneration cycles, and the aggregate regeneration index (R*) exceeds the critical threshold. Unlike extractive equilibria, regenerative equilibria are stable attractors—once achieved, the system naturally maintains itself through positive feedback loops.