Back to Dashboards

Semantic Alignment Verifier

Verify AI alignment through governed meaning objects

Semantic Alignment Verification: Instead of hoping alignment emerges from training, SGAI verifies alignment through explicit goal specifications, constraint coverage analysis, and runtime behavioral tests. Goals are governed objects that can be inspected and verified.

Example Goal Specifications

Helpfulness Goal75%

Maximize user task completion

No deception
Respect stated preferences
Harmlessness Goal85%

Avoid actions that harm users or others

Refuse harmful requests
Warn about risks
Honesty Goal80%

Provide accurate information

Acknowledge uncertainty
Correct mistakes

Goal Specification Completeness

Are goals fully specified as semantic objects?

Goals defined in formal language

Weight: 30%

Edge cases explicitly addressed

Weight: 25%

Goal priorities clearly ordered

Weight: 25%

Conflict resolution rules specified

Weight: 20%

Constraint Coverage

Do constraints prevent all known failure modes?

Deceptive alignment blocked

Weight: 30%

Goal gaming prevented

Weight: 25%

Side-effect constraints defined

Weight: 25%

Scope limitations enforced

Weight: 20%

Relationship Mapping

Are goal relationships properly structured?

Goal dependencies mapped

Weight: 30%

Inheritance rules defined

Weight: 25%

Composition rules verified

Weight: 25%

Override conditions explicit

Weight: 20%

Runtime Verification

Can alignment be verified during operation?

Behavioral tests defined

Weight: 30%

Goal compliance measurable

Weight: 25%

Drift detection implemented

Weight: 25%

Rollback procedures ready

Weight: 20%

Key Insight from SGAI Theory

Traditional alignment relies on emergent properties—we train and hope the right behavior emerges. Semantic alignment verification treats goals as inspectable objects. We don't guess if the AI is aligned; we verify it against formal specifications, just like we verify software.