Loading...
Loading...
Navigate legal reasoning at the level of doctrines, principles, and tests — not documents. Each node is a legal idea with typed relationships and paragraph-level provenance to authoritative sources.
Click a node to explore its connections. Drag to pan. Scroll to zoom. Nodes with + have more to discover.
Nodes
Confidence
Idea-Native Legal Discovery
Navigate legal reasoning at the idea level. Each node is a legal concept with typed relationships and paragraph-level provenance to authoritative sources.
Click any node to see its details and expand its connections. Nodes with a + badge have more connections to discover.
A neighbourhood of the duty of care doctrine in Australian negligence law. Each circle is a legal idea — a doctrine, principle, test, ratio, or open question. Lines between them are typed relationships: “requires,” “limits,” “extends to,” “refines.”
A keyword search for “AI duty of care” returns documents. This graph shows the reasoning structure: that AI liability connects to product liability, information provider liability, and professional negligence through typed doctrinal analogies — each traceable to specific case paragraphs.
Each node carries a confidence tier. Settled means HCA authority, curated by legal scholars. Extracted means AI-identified, awaiting verification. Contested means the classification is actively disputed. You always know what you can rely on.