Crisis Governance
When Controversy Hits, Do Decisions Hold?
Identify whether your institution can maintain decision integrity under public pressure.
This diagnostic helps institutions identify whether governance strain is emerging—before it becomes a public crisis. It does not assess values, content, or outcomes. It focuses only on decision integrity under pressure.
Section A — Early Stress Signals
Answer based on the last 12–18 months. This is an internal reflection tool, not a scorecard.
Senior leaders prioritise reputational risk over decision clarity
Decisions are delayed to "buy time" rather than resolve uncertainty
Procedural neutrality is increasingly described as harmful or inadequate
Pressure escalates faster than deliberation or review
Moral accusations influence decision timelines
Authority over decisions feels diffuse or unclear
Staff feel exposed when decisions attract controversy
0 of 7 answered