Loading...
Loading...
A $10,000 working-capital bridge against a signed commercial contract, committed from capital that has already been recycled once. Repayment is scheduled for the end of November 2026. The agreement is in place; the transfer has not yet been made, so no capital is counted as deployed.
Deployed through Elevate. Principal returns in full — what the schedule changes is how fast, not how much.
The same temporal mismatch as the first two cycles: a signed contract whose work must be paid for and delivered before the client invoice clears. What is different is the source of the capital — this bridge is funded from principal that returned from an earlier cycle rather than from new money raised for it.
$10,000 of recovered principal is committed as a further working-capital bridge, on the same non-extractive terms: zero interest, no liability, soft and recoverable. Recovery is scheduled for end November 2026 against the client milestone. If it completes, the same dollars will have funded two separate pieces of delivery — which is the specific claim the instrument makes and the one that cannot be shown by a single cycle, however fast it returns.
What makes this a regenerative deployment rather than a one-off grant.
The same mode as the earlier cycles. What this one tests is not the mode but the pool: whether recovered principal can be redeployed without a new fundraising round.
This is the first commitment made from money the pool has already recovered. Cycles 1 and 2 evidence recovery; this is what recovery is for.
Capital deployed, time-to-cash, and recycling rate R.
Work shipped to the contract — output and reach.