Research

Citations & References

Academic foundations and related research for the Perpetual Social Capital framework.

Primary Papers

The Perpetual Social Capital Framework: Regenerative Models for Charitable Capital Deployment

Ghadamian, R. (2025). SSRN Working Paper.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5784463

This paper introduces Perpetual Social Capital (PSC) as a fourth capital class alongside debt, equity, and grants. PSC combines the recycling benefits of loans with the burden-free nature of grants through soft repayment mechanisms. We derive the System Value Multiplier (SVM) showing that PSC generates 8.5×–51× more system value than traditional grants over 30 years, depending on recycling rate R.

Citation (APA)
Ghadamian, R. (2025). The Perpetual Social Capital Framework: Regenerative Models for Charitable Capital Deployment. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5784463

Regenerative Capital Theory: Beyond Debt, Equity, and Grants

Ghadamian, R. (2025). SSRN Working Paper.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5788982

A field-defining paper establishing 'Regenerative Capital' as a distinct economic paradigm. This work integrates PSC with public finance theory, commons economics, impact investing, and institutional resilience. It proposes a unifying model for non-extractive, multi-cycle capital frameworks capable of strengthening public-good systems over infinite horizons.

Citation (APA)
Ghadamian, R. (2025). Regenerative Capital Theory: Beyond Debt, Equity, and Grants. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5788982

The Political Economy of Regenerative Capital: Incentives, Power, and Institutional Behaviour under PSC

Ghadamian, R. (2025). SSRN Working Paper.

DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.5789323

This paper examines how Perpetual Social Capital reshapes political and institutional incentives across public-good systems. Using a public-choice and institutional economics framework, it analyses how PSC alters the distribution of budgetary authority, weakens fragility-based mechanisms of control, reduces dependency on discretionary grant power, changes donor psychology, and enhances institutional autonomy. The paper argues that PSC functions not only as a financial innovation but as a governance technology.

Citation (APA)
Ghadamian, R. (2025). The Political Economy of Regenerative Capital: Incentives, Power, and Institutional Behaviour under PSC. SSRN Working Paper. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5789323

Related Research

The Promise of Impact Investing

Barber, B. M., Morse, A., & Yasuda, A. (2021). Journal of Financial Economics.

Relevance: Foundation for understanding blended return expectations in social capital

Philanthropy in the 21st Century

Reich, R. (2018). Stanford Social Innovation Review.

Relevance: Context for why traditional philanthropy models need evolution

The Economics of Microfinance

Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). MIT Press.

Relevance: Understanding loan-based social finance and its limitations that PSC addresses

Effective Altruism and the Allocation of Charitable Giving

MacAskill, W. (2015). Oxford University Press.

Relevance: Framework for evaluating philanthropic impact efficiency

Social Impact Bonds: A Pathways Analysis

Gustafsson-Wright, E., Gardiner, S., & Putcha, V. (2015). Brookings Institution.

Relevance: Alternative outcome-based financing mechanisms

Program-Related Investments: A Technical Manual

Foundation Center (2020). Foundation Center.

Relevance: Tax-advantaged charitable investment structures applicable to PSC

Have research to contribute?

We welcome academic collaboration on PSC development.

Contact Us