Loading...
Loading...
The design of institutions that can acknowledge constraint without losing coherence—enabling scoped participation rather than universal pretence, and embedding learning and revision as normal operations rather than crisis responses. The alternative to 'living within a lie'.
An institution practicing architectural truthfulness might state: 'We can enforce this commitment among these members, under these conditions, with these revision mechanisms'—rather than claiming universal jurisdiction it cannot sustain.
LGIT Section 2.6