Skip to main content

Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture^™IRSA^™Catalysing systems designed for renewal

Loading...

Catalysing systems designed for renewal.

Research

Pathways
Explainers
Papers
Case Studies
Comparisons

Learn

Why Institutions Fail
Why Reforms Fail
Why Governance Fails
Why Accountability Fails
Short-Termism
All Entry Points →

Apply

Diagnostics
Dashboards
Programs

About

About
Approach
Governance
People
News
Contact

Newsletter

New research delivered to your inbox.

© 2026 Institute for Regenerative Systems Architecture™ (IRSA™). All rights reserved.

Back to Glossary

Commitment & Enforcement Architecture

Architectural Evaluation

Definition

A diagnostic approach that asks which architectural link in the action chain is missing, weakened, or bypassable—rather than evaluating outcomes, compliance, or intent. Treats institutions as systems with identifiable failure points rather than black boxes.

Example

Rather than asking 'Why did this policy fail?' ask: Is learning protected from legitimacy threat? Do commitments bind future decision-makers? Are enforcement mechanisms symmetric? Can action persist through turnover?

Source

CEA-LTE Section 5.1

Read Explainer View Paper

Related Terms from Commitment & Enforcement Architecture

Commitment & Enforcement Architecture (CEA)

Five CEA Primitives

Performative Commitment

Architectural Commitment

Commitment-Execution Gap

Explore the Full Glossary

Search 905 terms across all IRSA research papers.

Browse All Terms