Loading...
Loading...
Sixth performative governance archetype using commitments primarily to absorb external pressure. Commitments produced in response to public scrutiny or crisis, without corresponding internal reconfiguration, as reassurance signals rather than operational mandates. Once scrutiny subsides, execution urgency dissipates.
Following a public scandal, an organisation announces comprehensive reform program, establishes oversight committee, publishes progress reports. Two years later, same structural vulnerabilities remain; reform existed to absorb legitimacy pressure, not to change operations.
CEA-PG Section 4.6