Free Institutional Tools

Assess commons governance quality against Elinor Ostrom's 8 design principles for sustainable resource management.

Score your organization's AI governance maturity across 8 dimensions: strategy, ethics, data, oversight, transparency, accountability, risk, and capability.

Build a visual logic model: Inputs to Activities to Outputs to Outcomes to Impact. Export a narrative summary.

Checklist assessment of institutional health warning signs across leadership, mission, culture, governance, adaptation, and stakeholder relations.

Score how far an organization has drifted from its founding mission across strategic, resource, narrative, stakeholder, and cultural dimensions.

Model capital flows with R-Factor recycling. Configure initial capital, recycling rate, admin costs, and cycle length.

Score governance complexity based on layers, stakeholders, jurisdictions, decision types, regulations, and interdependencies.

Assess trust levels across stakeholder groups on 5 dimensions: competence, integrity, benevolence, transparency, and reliability.

Multi-dimensional resilience assessment across financial, operational, governance, adaptive, relational, and cultural dimensions.

Select policy interventions and see projected systemic effects across trust, participation, equity, innovation, sustainability, and resilience.

Assess democratic legitimacy across participation, accountability, deliberation, representation, transparency, and contestability.

Design a knowledge commons governance framework: scope, access model, contribution, governance, licensing, sustainability, and enclosure protection.

Model Olson's collective action dynamics: group size, benefits, costs, free-riding, social pressure, and excludability effects.

Map system variables, feedback loops, delays, and leverage points. Identify reinforcing and balancing dynamics.

Browse 12+ proven governance patterns: consent-based decisions, subsidiarity, sortition, quadratic voting, commons governance, and more.

Score how well your organization captures, stores, retrieves, and transfers knowledge across 6 dimensions.

Map formal and informal power structures. Plot actors by power level and alignment to identify champions, supporters, opponents, and bystanders.

Assess social license across legitimacy, credibility, trust, community consent, and impact management. Based on Thomson & Boutilier model.

Calculate ROI on governance investment through risk reduction, decision speed, compliance savings, reputation, and staff retention.

Profile your institution across 8 traits: purpose, structure, timeframe, risk, openness, adaptation, governance style, and knowledge orientation.

Test whether your institution can maintain decision integrity under public pressure. Diagnoses frozen vs escalatory governance failure patterns.

Assess whether your institution has sufficient insulation to maintain judgment capacity under pressure.

Assess whether authority structures governing commitment are aligned with mission-critical time horizons.

Diagnose whether governance mechanisms are proliferating without providing time-bounded authority.

Compare how institutions respond to economic shocks, donor loss, and political transitions.

Diagnose whether your institution defaults to anti-learning patterns where lessons fail to alter behaviour.

Identify which fragility cycle is suppressing learning in your institution.

Assess whether your institution is experiencing a difficult transition or a legitimacy rupture requiring re-founding.

Identify early signs of mission drift and purpose erosion. Assess whether institutional memory systems are preserving intent.

Detect whether your founding narrative is being gradually reinterpreted across leadership changes.

Track gradual dilution of investment mission across fund lifecycles with erosion metrics and intervention triggers.

Detect gradual reinterpretation of institutional purpose. Measure semantic drift in how your mission is communicated.

Assess whether your constitution or charter can defend itself against reinterpretation and capture.

Assess whether your institutional commitments have real binding strength or can be quietly bypassed.

Evaluate whether your oversight institution has drifted from its founding mandate.

Identify which fragility cycles your capital is coupled to and assess decoupling opportunities.

Assess structural prerequisites for long-horizon, regenerative funding.

Assess whether your fund's investment thesis is drifting from its original purpose.

Evaluate whether your capital cycles are aligned with mission cycles.

Compare P&L, Cashflow, and Balance Sheet equivalents across capital models.

Compare four capital classes across 8 dimensions with radar visualization.

Synchronize investment mission with capital structure. Make purpose structurally prior to returns.

Compare short-term vs long-term investment outcomes and societal value.

Quantify the gap between market evaluation cycles (quarters) and real value creation timelines (decades).

See how a single donation flows through multiple PSC cycles. Adjustable R factor and multi-cycle tracking.

Explore how charitable deductions combine with regenerative capital models. Federal and state deductions.

Watch how a single donation flows through multiple recycling cycles with cumulative impact tracking.

See when each beneficiary receives support with event timelines and milestone tracking.

Compare how the same donation performs across 5 different impact sectors.

Deep dive into the mathematics of System Value Multipliers. R factor analysis and reference tables.

Design conditions that must hold across all governance transitions. Supermajority rules and temporal locks.

Map pre-governing, governing, control, and enforcement layers for your institution.

Design governance rules that protect temporal integrity across leadership turnover.

Verify whether a capital system satisfies six structural invariants with 18 assessment questions.

Diagnose sector architecture across infrastructure, authority, scope, temporality, meaning, and alignment.

Explore how different funding models distribute power between stakeholders.

Evaluate whether AI objectives are aligned with institutional mission. Identify drift between stated goals and operational behaviour.

Analyze how AI goals can exist independently of neural network weights.

Verify AI alignment through governed meaning objects rather than weight optimization.

Design governed meaning objects with container-object separation for AI systems.

Analyze how meaning objects carry their own constraints and governance rules.

Calculate your institution's R* score using structural invariants and behavioural dimensions.

Visualize how the Regeneration Index evolves over time under different configurations.

Model how structural invariants combine to create regenerative systems.

Explore the four-layer Regenerative Systems Architecture stack with scenario comparison.

Calculate alignment and decoupling operators to measure how well funding aligns with beneficiary lifecycle needs.

Visualize four capital types in extraction-horizon phase space.

Visualize how the Decoupling Operator eliminates four universal fragilities.

Compose alignment and decoupling operators algebraically to verify institutional design properties.

Model equilibrium conditions where regenerative capital becomes self-sustaining across the economy.

Explore foundational properties that make systems capable of self-renewal and regeneration.

Comprehensive assessment of institutional governance capabilities across multiple dimensions.

Measure and compare institutional capacity across global contexts.

Systematic checklist for designing regenerative institutional systems.

Visualize multi-generational climate adaptation funding. See how pools compound over 50+ year horizons.

Configure and simulate governance-mode pools for climate infrastructure.

Model capital progression through cycles with government transition overlays.

Analyze how four fragility cycles threaten development programs and how to protect against them.

Calculate temporal misalignment between funding cycles and mission cycles.

Calculate compliance probability using friction, identity, and community mechanisms.

Design systems that make preferred behaviour the path of least resistance.

Visualize how catalytic capital flows through five functional layers.

Explore the 3-dimensional matrix mapping capital types, instruments, and time.

Calculate catalytic leverage, temporal smoothing, and replicability metrics.

Map which financial instruments deliver which catalytic functions.

700+ observations tracking structural stress, grievance activation, and institutional trajectory across Australia (2001-2023).

10-year analysis of social cohesion using Scanlon Foundation data with recovery metrics.

Track your progress through the regenerative systems curriculum.